No real complaints from me, like i said i think your team displays good judgement. I was even surprised by how much you are willing to give the subject the benefit of the doubt, which is a good thing mostly, depending on context. However i still don't understand why people got the impression that every moment in the whole first video was meant to be proof. I clearly pointed out that there was no editing and a lot of unnecessary stops and aim checks that weren't meant to imply anything and were only done since DA was missing and because i only did two takes when i recorded it. Guess nobody reads descriptions.